http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:06:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-229164 dgramarao Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:01:49 +0000 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-229164 in the case of malingas bowling by the time the ball leaves his hand it is much below his shoulders which is impossible when bowled ov er head his ball leaveshis hand even as low as four feet from ground. This makes the ball go crazing the pitch by the time it nears crease. It is unfortunate that the board passed his action. Bowling action must be redefined and such faulty bowlers should be debarred from play in the case of malingas bowling by the time the ball leaves his hand it is much below his shoulders which is impossible when bowled ov er head
his ball leaveshis hand even as low as four feet from ground. This makes the ball go crazing the pitch by the time it nears crease. It is unfortunate that the board passed his action. Bowling action must be redefined and such faulty bowlers should be debarred from play

]]> http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-221408 UGK Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:24:53 +0000 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-221408 It is sad that so many ignoramuses claim Malingas action has never been seen before in cricket and is therefore illegal. Thankfully the ICC has records that show that his round arm style was used over a 100 years ago. The overarm style was developed later because it was more accurate. Anyone who says bowling with Malingas action gives an 'unfair advantage' dont know what they are talking about. Try playing an entire match with that action. You will bowl wide after wide after wide. Its incredibly difficult to control. Another incorrect point people are making is that he is chucking because his arm is not going over his head. More nonsense. Chucking is dependent on how you bend your arm. Calling murali a chucker is understandable because it looks that way in real time. Calling Malinga a chucker is just plain ignorance and possibly jealousy also. It is sad that so many ignoramuses claim Malingas action has never been seen before in cricket and is therefore illegal. Thankfully the ICC has records that show that his round arm style was used over a 100 years ago. The overarm style was developed later because it was more accurate.
Anyone who says bowling with Malingas action gives an ‘unfair advantage’ dont know what they are talking about. Try playing an entire match with that action. You will bowl wide after wide after wide. Its incredibly difficult to control.
Another incorrect point people are making is that he is chucking because his arm is not going over his head. More nonsense. Chucking is dependent on how you bend your arm.
Calling murali a chucker is understandable because it looks that way in real time. Calling Malinga a chucker is just plain ignorance and possibly jealousy also.

]]> http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-218305 King Obama Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:42:33 +0000 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-218305 Obama says malinga is a baller who brakes the basmans toe and his little bat. Obama says malinga is a baller who brakes the basmans toe and his little bat.

]]> http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-216249 no brainer ?? Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:53:39 +0000 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-216249 The term "Chuck" or "Throw" implies a bent arm .. anyone with the slightest understanding of sport could see thats impossible to achieve that with a slingy action as his .. not only have you got the terminology wrong but display complete ignorance .. how about coming up with some other excuse to ridicule him .. SOUR GRAPES !! The term “Chuck” or “Throw” implies a bent arm .. anyone with the slightest understanding of sport could see thats impossible to achieve that with a slingy action as his .. not only have you got the terminology wrong but display complete ignorance .. how about coming up with some other excuse to ridicule him .. SOUR GRAPES !!

]]> http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-213115 Deepanjan Fri, 20 May 2011 19:15:33 +0000 http://www.ambimama.com/2009/04/30/malinga-must-be-checked-for-chucking/#comment-213115 Malinga .... a complete nonsense bowler .... he actually not bowling he is ridiculing ICC .... which is again a complete loser body which allows itself to be ridiculed bu one national board or the other .....cmng. back to malinga all his records shd stand redundant from this day ... and he shd be packed and sent to a remote island and best forgotten .... BAN him now Malinga …. a complete nonsense bowler …. he actually not bowling he is ridiculing ICC …. which is again a complete loser body which allows itself to be ridiculed bu one national board or the other …..cmng. back to malinga all his records shd stand redundant from this day … and he shd be packed and sent to a remote island and best forgotten …. BAN him now

]]>